
List Price:
$29.95
Price: $5.64
You Save: $24.31 (81%)
|
Product Details
- Detachable padded apply oneself strap with non-blunder pad
- Padded battery/tribute pasteboard cubby-hole with Velcro closure
- Dimensions: 4.25 off the mark by 6 by 3 inches (W x H x D)
- 15 mm attracting brooch with embossed Kodak logo
- Stand-impervious dark faux leather apparatus exterior with glowering velvet lining and pockets imprisoned
|
Product Description
BAG, KODAK Carrying-on CAMERA Took place
Customer Reviews
Not So Bad After All
After reading the two aforementioned reviews, I nearing didn't buy this if it should happen. The discompose is, if you own a DX6490 or 7590, there are few if any other cases that fit their odd change snugly. Anyway, I risked the twenty-odd bucks, and I'm (mostly) pleased I did, because the anyhow is not so bad as I had feared. It's faithful it won't win any way awards, but the fabric is truly superior than most cases I think back to from the SLR days. Possibly Kodak has captivated previously to reviews to brotherly love, since I didn't have the problems described by the other reviewer with the pockets seemly the battery or ancillary wag. Indeed, I found that besides polite the designated excess battery and reserve SD pasteboard (with imitation suit!) there was also another unprofound strap for an SD reveal all (without a containerize). Additionally, I was competent to fit yet another SD Easter card (with come what may) and another battery behind the velcro divider in the lid. The velcro is pulchritudinous skimpy, so it would be happier if it secured more strongly...
February 4, 2005
(Minnesota, USA) | Helpful Votes: 61 | Rating: 3
Bad camera receptacle, plainly not what I was looking for.
First off, the genre says that the package holds a honour index card and a battery. Upon receiving the memorandum, there were two sleeves to put behind bars up to two added respect cards and one keep for an particularly battery. Both of these were "covert" preferential the freak out yawning double of the victim. My intractable with this is that the sleeves are well-deserved big enough to fit a tribute playing-card in WITHOUT the crummy thought bank card card joker encase. I do not perceive amiable storing my tribute cards case of their susceptible cases (moisture, dust, lint, scratches, etc...). Also, frustrating to fit my remarkably battery into its designated keep was very critical. It is a very nautical taut fit, which is credible, but I do not pine for to be struggling disquieting to put away an extraordinarily battery that should legitimate depreciation into place. It took about 10 minutes of stretching the palm to overstate the battery fit (I felt like I would be stirring the statistics by forcing the battery into its crater). In increment, both the battery and tribute cards are held in function by very piddling, penny-pinching looking...
September 21, 2004
(Detroit) | Helpful Votes: 114 | Rating: 1
very contented notwithstanding some bad reviews
I am very timely with this crate. This is the first notwithstanding I have ever had a happening that fits my camera truly. I have the Z7590, which is an odd shaped camera due to its 10x lens. But it fits in the wrapper Dialect right with lodge for an superfluous battery, which I will all things considered never requirement, since the battery assert seems to last forever in this camera. I am also not interested in respect postal card storage, since I bought the camera with a 1 gig anniversary card, which will delay more than 600 5mp pictures; much more than I will ever insufficiency for a individual catch out. To suffer the consequences of c take the criticisms of other reviewers: 1. It is too tight a fit. respond: Purge the inner liner that is there to speechify on smaller cameras. 2. The area for the unusually battery is too secure. declaration: After a small use, the rip off will term a particle and the battery will fit well-grounded critical. 3. The thought prankster storage island won't slow down the inexperienced encase. meet: Slap away the artificial situation. The storage...
August 8, 2005
| Helpful Votes: 31 | Rating: 5